Posts

Showing posts with the label Huffington Post

ISIL Mind Games on Muslims are same as Americans Play on Each Other

The media all ablaze with the latest news regarding the airstrikes.  Many with the ability to hold serve on camera making lob shots into an art form and those with the authority to right the ship are missing or absent from the bridge. To make my point, consider when it comes to foreign affairs the usual suspects are quickly rounded up by cable news shows thinking that booking them will increase viewership and ratings.  Only what they don’t know or care not to know is that they are being used to spread their propaganda just like those radical groups we all swear to hate. We say that it is important to stop the ruining of young minds with all the hate and racism rhetoric but we continue to listen to and report this same crap over every single  airwaves  that we can find.  Fox News will always seek the advice of a proven fabricator like Dick Cheney when it comes to foreign policy of this administration.  Now this is the same guy who had a hand in the ...

The Downward Journey of Journalism

Not much surprises me these days but nothing makes me shake my head more than those whose job is to inform finding hit and miss messages to spread thinking that only controversy sells.  Much like advertisers think that a good product will never reach millions of consumers unless it is attached to barely clothed women or some handsome hunk without a shirt.  Contrary to Wall Street wisdom, sex does not sell, it only directs the mind toward sex and demises the product you are trying to sell but that’s just a layman’s view and apparently it doesn't count. Take for example the recent uproar presented to us by Ed Mazza of the Huffington Post who found it important to waste ink and print room on “President Obama Criticized for 'Latte Salute' While Stepping off Marine One”.  Personally I can think of a billions things that could have occupied this space and our time better than this but then I am not the one who chooses what is plastered on the pages of so-called news magazines....

Anti-Obama Documentary sheds light not on Obama but on Makers

In a time when it appears that money is the primary and sometimes sole motivator behind movements we make, it is apparent that this may have been the only true reason for the new anti-Obama documentary as evidenced by The Huffington Post in an article titled 2016: Obama's America' Expands Into More Theaters Amid Accuracy Issues by Kia Makarechi.  I say this because it appears that it’s co-director, Dinesh D’Souza and it’s producer, Gerald Molen, have risked their reputation to present a movie that is supposed to be based on fact while showing severe indifference. The article chronicles the rise of the gross at the box office “this past weekend” as well as the expansion of it’s audience.  It states that “Molen defended the project as “fair and truthful” in a recent interview” but “the Associated Press fact-checked the film, which attempts to trace the roots of Obama's ideology. The newswire service found a number of errors or claims that are not made in good faith”.  Th...

Roars from the Right and the Selective Left Abound Regarding the Death of bin Laden

Ever since this president was sworn in, there have been those who will stop at nothing but to oppose anything and everything that he says and does.   It is not so unexpected but it still is bewildering.   The newest media frenzy is over the anniversary of the death of Osama bin Laden and decenters are given a microphone and all the time they need on every channel to roar.   The sad part of it is, many of them may have more at stake than this media mass are interested in finding out. John McCain says that the Obama Re-election Team was wrong for politicizing the death of bin Laden but many refuse to remind people that John McCain ran on having the knowledge and expertise to find and “get” bin Laden.   So was that politicizing it then or does McCain get a mulligan?   Ed Gillespie repeated close to this take but I do not remember him stepping to the microphone and declaring it off-limits when George W. Bush and Dick Cheney was going around bragging about ke...

Does this mean that Female Lawmakers support The War on Women?

The more I consider the “War on Women” and all of the bills being pushed and passed by Republican-led State Houses as well as those being crafted in Washington, I cannot help but wonder where are the female lawmakers and why are they voting for things like this? Take for example the information found in the article by Amanda Terkel of the Huffington Post titled Scott Walker Quietly Repeals Wisconsin Equal Pay Law.    There had to be some female lawmakers in the Republican Party that thought this was not a good idea.   How can they not see the regression that this and other bills will cause all women?   Are they under the impression that these bills will not affect them or their daughters and sisters?   The article reports that the law quietly signed by Scott Walker harms the "economic security as a women’s health issue," Sara Finger, executive director of WAWH. "The salary women are paid directly affects the type and frequency of health care services t...

Is the selling of the Huffington Post to AT&T comparable to Republicans attack on unions?

If you knew that AT&T was more pro-business and less customer relations and opposed things that you favored would you sell out to them?   May be because the Huffington Post was seen as a prominent force in support of President Obama.   I wonder now how Huffington Post will change now that they owe this publication. I asked this question because of the recent email I received from Michael Kieschnick, President of Credo Mobile titled HOW   VERIZON   AND   AT&T   HAVE SUPPORTED THE   RIGHT WING   — AND WHY YOU SHOULD   SWITCH TO CREDO MOBILE in this email what I think was important to see was “d oes your company support politicians   directly   opposed to your values?   Both   AT&T   and  Verizon Wireless  supported politicians who are out to deregulate corporations and scuttle climate change regulation. In 2009-2010, AT&T gave   $426,000   to House and Senate  Tea Party Caucus ...

Simple answer as to why no intervention in Yemen, Bahrain and other areas

There may be hundreds of reasons why there has been no intervention in the conflict of the countries mentioned above and more that we have yet to learn about but to me it all revolves around one simple answer.   Times have changed and so have the majority of Americans. I remember a day, while serving in the United States Marine Corps, we used to look for ways to showcase our military might and if any thing happened to give us a chance to do that we were glad to immerse ourselves in it.   That was then and this is now.   With the current military thinly stretched, the last thing we wish to do is involve ourselves in any situation which would tie us down for years.   Some argue that this is the same in Libya but I respectfully disagree with that.   With the lead taken by other countries that normally means they will be responsible for the majority of the price tag.   American war fighting technology is second to none and its use can diminish the need for gro...