Is Law Enforcement really above the Law?
I ask this question because there are so many
stories surfacing now about the over-reach of police and the blatant assumption
that they can do whatever it is they want and not have to worry about
responsibility. It used to be something
you would only see in some of these police shows on television or in a Cops
episode but now I guess its life imitating art.
Take as an example this article from the Associated Press
reporting that “a northern New Mexico sheriff was arrested Friday on charges he
cornered a driver at a dead end, threatened him with a silver revolver as the
driver begged not to be shot and had him falsely charged with assault. U.S. Attorney Damon Martinez announced Rio
Arriba County Sheriff Thomas Rodella, who has had brushes with scandal
throughout his career, and his son, Thomas Jr., were arrested by FBI agents at
their Espanola homes in the March confrontation that left the driver injured. Authorities
didn't detail the injuries. The driver
was arrested on charges of aggravated assault of a peace officer and aggravated
assault with a deadly weapon on March 11, but prosecutors dismissed the case
two weeks later. The Rodellas pleaded
not guilty at an arraignment in U.S. District Court in Albuquerque on charges
of conspiring to violate the driver's civil rights, falsifying arrest documents
and other charges.”
It was further reported that this individual had
been in trouble multiple times and yet still was allowed to roam free, carry a
badge and represent the people of Northern New Mexico. My question is why? Why would those who knew about this allow this
to continue as if they didn't expect for things to get completely out of
control. How many times must we see that
when you turn a blind eye to something or pretend that it doesn't exist, it does not go away but become bigger and most often stronger? Do we not figure that for every instance we
keep our heads buried in the sand another life gets upended and that life now
is infected and may turn diseased.
The truly sad part of this whole thing is that those
who are supposed to be more educated may not be based on the decisions that
they make. I say that because in this
same article it is reported that even after hearing all this still “a federal
judge on Friday released both men on their own recognizance and ordered the
sheriff not to carry a firearm.” Really,
your honor, released on his own recognizance and his only punishment, which may
never be enforced, is to not carry a firearm.
Should we even address him as your honor because there is no honor in
what he did nor is that justice for the individual that he and his son
man-handled. If true, this sheriff and
his son more than violated that man’s civil rights but he violated the oath of
the office and the oath that he took.
Not to mention all of those good law enforcement officials who face the
chance of death and yet still perform as they should, he violated their trust
and diminished their names.
Comments
Post a Comment