Georgia GOP Revises Reconstruction and threatens the Profits of Big Business
No other adage can be counted upon to be proven true
than the adage which says that history repeats itself. This is abundantly evident with the newest
moves from the Georgia State GOP.
According to the Associated Press dot com, in an
article titled “Georgia House passes GOP bill rolling back voting access”,
it is reported that “Republican lawmakers in Georgia muscled legislation
through the state House on Monday that would roll back voting access, over the
objection of Democrats and civil rights groups gathered at the Capitol to
protest. The bill comes after record
turnout led to Democratic wins in Georgia’s presidential election and two U.S.
Senate runoffs. House Bill 531 passed the lower legislative chamber by a vote
of 97-72. It now goes to the state Senate for more debate. The far-reaching
bill would require a photo ID for absentee voting, limit the amount of time
voters have to request an absentee ballot, restrict where ballot drop boxes
could be located and when they could be accessed, and limit early voting hours
on weekends, among many other changes. It is one of a flood of election bills
being pushed by GOP lawmakers across the country this year that would add new
barriers to voting. Republicans say the measure is needed to restore the
public’s confidence in elections, after former President Donald Trump and his
allies relentlessly pushed false claims about fraud. “House Bill 531 is
designed to begin to bring back the confidence of our voters back into our
election system,” said Republican Rep. Barry Fleming, the measure’s chief
sponsor”.
Compare it to this nation’s history according to National Geographic in their article titled “The Black Codes and Jim Crow Laws”, they say that “One of the first reactions against Reconstruction was to deprive African-American men of their voting rights. While the 14th and 15th Amendments prevented state legislatures from directly making it illegal to vote, they devised a number of indirect measures to disenfranchise black men. The grandfather clause said that a man could only vote if his ancestor had been a voter before 1867—but the ancestors of most African-Americans citizens had been enslaved and constitutionally ineligible to vote. Another discriminatory tactic was the literacy test, applied by a white county clerk. These clerks gave black voters extremely difficult legal documents to read as a test, while white men received an easy text. Finally, in many places, white local government officials simply prevented potential voters from registering.
The question which should be asked of those pushing this lie is, when you say “restore the confidence of our voters back into our election system” do they mean Republican voters or every voter? If they are only speaking of restoration of confidence for just republican voters, then the problem that appears to have been over-looked is the intended or unintended results of attempting to hold down groups of people who have proven time and time again that they will not be silenced.
A power that was unknown to the oppressed back in the Reconstruction Era but is widely known to these communities now is the real impact each of these groups combined has over the economy of any federal, state, or local government.
I speak of the information
found in an article called “Black Impact: Consumer Categories where African Americans
Move Markets” which can be found at Nielsen dot com. In this article, it is made clear that “Black consumers account for a disproportionate
amount of product sales in a number of fast-moving consumer goods categories. With
$1.2 trillion in spending power, African-American consumers are an important
population for smart brands that want to grow market share and brand
preference. More importantly, the data suggests that Black consumer spending
already significantly affects the bottom line in many categories and
industries, and brands can’t afford to lose favor or traction with this segment
without potential negative impact. “When it comes to African-American
consumer spend, there are millions, sometimes billions of dollars in revenue at
stake,” said Andrew McCaskill, Senior Vice President, Global Communications and
Multicultural Marketing, Nielsen.
So Georgia GOP and all
the others who truly wish to return to the Reconstruction Era may get there way
for now but what happens to big business’ profits when those who are greatly
affected by their actions begin to decide to move this huge spending revenue
from them and take it to others who are seen to be visually and constantly
fighting alongside of them? Not sure if
big business wishes to answer to shareholders about smaller dividend checks,
risk loss of their wealth, their generational positions in their communities or even
their kids’ college funds.
Comments
Post a Comment