Police Association President shows America in a Judge Dredd/RoboCop Police State
Every
once in a while there comes an incident which gives rise and credence to an old
saying. The old saying is “sometimes the
best defense to something that is indefensible is to keep your mouth shut”. Someone should have told Jeffery Follmer
that.
In
case you didn’t know Jeffery Follmer is the President of the Cleveland Police Patrolmen’s
Association and he was a guest on MSNBC’s All In with Chris Hayes. He had to have known he was going to be a
guest before he appeared and should have practiced his talking points and
possible questions that he might face on that show. I am sure that they would have given him the
time to better prepare so that he came across as rational and reasonable. In my opinion, that would have been time well
spent, but he did not and said some things that not only offended me as a black
man with young black male and female children but offended me as a former law
enforcement officer and U. S. Marine. If
he had a point, he might have been better serve to have just made it over and
over again without getting a little agitated and coming off arrogant.
Mr.
Follmer expressed an opinion that the “killing of 12-year-old Tamir Rice was justified”
not only by the words of the officers but by the tape which he said speaks for
itself. As a father, I have to pause at
getting any one of my children a toy gun for Christmas for fear that they could
be called in as a 20 year old black male with a gun pointing it at others. Then have a police car pull right up to the
them and the police officer closest to him firing in 2 seconds after the
vehicle had come to a rolling stop.
Seeing this as something that should be more closely investigated and
calling it an act of justice if they do does not make me a hater of
police. What it makes me is a father, a concerned
citizen and taxpayer with the right to question any place where my taxes go.
Mr.
Follmer was demanding an apology from the National Football League’s Cleveland
Browns because one of their star receivers, Andrew Hawkins wore a warm-up shirt
with words calling for justice for Tamir Rice and John Crawford. Mr. Follmer suggested that calling for
justice in those cases disrespected those two officers and therefore
disrespected all of them. I found myself
greatly offended by that statement because it implies that what one cop does
should reflect upon us all and I do not accept that. We are all cops but we are also individuals
and should be seen as such. The good
will you receive after encountering a good cop does not mean that you will
encounter that same goodwill from all cops.
Each officer will react based on where they are at the time of the
incident and if they are in a bad place then not all cops should be tagged with
that.
Mr.
Follmer further suggested that there would be none of this hoopla if Tamir Rice
had been twenty years old. He said “if
he had been twenty years old, we wouldn’t be here today”. First of all, it’s more about shooting and killing
an unarmed person. Now I understand your
point that it appeared that he had a gun even though it was a toy so
considering that, would not the proper response would have been to embrace the
city’s sorrow and the families pain without making it a us versus them
thing? Mr. Follmer offered a solution to
the problem by saying that all those who come into contact with police have to
do is “Listen to police officer’s commands, when we tell you to do something
you do it, stop. Do as we say and you are
right the court will sort it out”. This
offended me as a retired U. S. Marine because our military does not go to war
to just defend the rights of police officers to act as judge, jury and
executioner. We step upon that battle
field to fight for all Americans regardless of color, sex, or economic
standing. To say do what we tell you
mean that they are playing master and making our cities the new
plantation. Americans are free to
practice their freedoms, those very same freedoms that many of my fellow
military members died for so how can this be if we are to blindly follow any
man or woman because of an ornament dangling from their chests. He says to do as we say and if you are right
the courts will sort it out, well shouldn’t the same argument be used for cops
who others believe stepped wrong. If we
have to endure cop style justice, holding our tongues until our court date,
what makes cops better and privileged?
We were granted equal rights under the constitution and we were granted
equal justice under the law. If we are
equal in the eyes of the law, then cops should be willing to stand like us,
endure the court style justice, holding their tongues and wait until their
court time.
This
type of talk is contradictory to finding a solution and now we know that it has
taken over police unions. Cleveland is
not the only place where police unions have been sold to the highest bidder and
now we have a system where all those without a badge or a law degree are not
only at the mercy of our court system but now we are at the mercy of the entire
legal system. Wonder how many veterans would
have thrown down their arms and walked off the battle field if we had been told
this was the kind of America we were fighting for.
Comments
Post a Comment